3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) ) 9 VELJON JEANELLE COMBS, ) Department: 403 In the context of original replies, timely unverified responses containing both objections and answers may serve to maintain objections. 11 ) ) 5 ) UPA served the original responses to the same RPODs and FIs months prior. ) ) Civil Law & Motion Tentative Rulings Effective January 1, 2021, San Mateo Superior Court is a direct calendar court for all Civil Matters. Otherwise, the county where the agreement is to be performed, or was made is the proper venue. 100 6 ELIZABETH MORRIS, ) Case Number: FDI-13-780247 As addressed above, the demurrer is SUSTAINED, in part, and OVERRULED, in part, and the motion to strike is DENIED. Strategic discovery misconduct resulting in terminating sanctions is not a proper basis for mandatory relief under CCP 473(b). 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: SPOUSAL 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Therefore, it lies only where the defects appear on the face of the pleading or are judicially noticed. (SKF Farms v. Superior Court (1984) 153 Cal.App.3d 902, 905.) ) ) Family Law handles domestic relations cases including dissolutions, separations, nullity, domestic violence prevention, paternity actions, child custody, child support, visitation arrangements, spousal support, family support and adoptions. ) Jury clerks are also available by phone at (415) 444-7120, between the hours of 1:00 to 3:00 PM and by email at jury@marincourt.org. 11 ) 11 ) ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 If all parties agree in writing, you may request that the Court rule on your filed noticed motion without a hearing on the Civil Law & Motion Calendars: Monday Limited Civil Law and Motion Department 13 at 9:05 am; Friday Civil Law and Motion Department 14 at 9:00 am; Friday Civil Law and Motion Department 15 at 9:00 am; Tuesday Civil Complex . The right of privacy protects a partys medical records even if the information is relevant to the litigation. Conduct falling below the standard of care does not constitute excusable neglect as required under the discretionary portion of CCP 473(b). The San Francisco Superior Court is currently under Presiding Judge Robert Dondero, and Assistant Presiding Judge David Ballati. ) 5 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) ) 11 ) ) Plaintiff and SFPKOA met and conferred regarding Plaintiffs perceived insufficiencies of the responses. 9 MARCUS C HOPKINS, ) Department: 403 11 ) ) SKPKOAs counsel Summer Smith appeared at the hearing and argued against the motion. Local Rule 8.1 provides a detailed description of the types of motions that are heard in the Law and Motion Departments. Exchange(2006) 135 Cal.App.4th 1138, 1144. Service to the other party or their lawyer may be done either by mail or in person. (Subd (e) amended and relettered effective January 1, 2004; adopted as part of subd (d).). ) 6 ALEXANDRIA DELOZADA, ) Case Number: FLD-16-396426 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF CHILD CUSTODY, VISITATION (P 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) ) With this limitation, the court GRANTS the requests for judicial notice. 8H-8, Enforcing Demand: 8:1484, 8:1487; contra CCP 2031.310 (b-c) (a motion to compel further shall set forth good cause for the demand and shall be filed within 45 days of service of the unsatisfactory response). 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT To see department rules regarding virtual hearings, as well as virtual hearing instructions, please . 5 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: CHANGE OF SPOUSAL OR PARTNER 3 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Ex Parte Motion Superior Court of California San Francisco Timing Notice. However, when a plaintiff suffers a single personal injury by reason of the wrongful act of a defendant, there is ordinarily only one cause of action. San Francisco County Superior Court Law and Motion Department. Attn: Appellate Court Services. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 See, e.g. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 Attorneys will NOT advise clients on the laws of any State or any State law legal matters (with the exception of California). 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 9 DONTAE HILL SR., ) Department: 403 was before the court on the motion for summary judgment, and it was for the trial court in the first instance to determine whether the question could be decided as a matter of law. Plaintiff complains that he has suffered permanent injuries because of Defendants negligent or intentional failure to diagnose and treat him properly when he sought medical care at Defendant Santa Rosa Memorial Hospital (SRMH) on April 6, 2020. ) The memorandum must contain a statement of facts, a concise statement of the law, evidence and arguments relied on, and a discussion of the statutes, cases, and textbooks cited in support of the position advanced. A case citation must include the official report volume and page number and year of decision. A motion to strike may be based on failure to comply with form or procedures applicable to pleadings. 11 ) 5 9 PATRICIA OJEDA GOMEZ, ) Department: 404 Print | E-mail Civil and Family Law Tentative Rulings Please refer to the notice entitled "Information Regarding Coronavirus (COVID-19) and Court Operations" on the court's home page for further detailed information. 11 ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 5 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 3, 2023 C. Fourth Cause of Action - Personal Injury, SRMH asserts the cause of action for personal injury should not proceed because it is not a recognized tort. 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING ) ) ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE STATUTORY FEES 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: CHANGE OF CHILD SUPPORT 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO SCV-270126, Lopes v. Petaluma City School District. Room 402 (415) 551-3900, 8:30 a.m. - 12:30p.m. Monday - Friday (excluding Court holidays), 2023 Superior Court of California - County of San Francisco, Caf at Civic Center Courthouse - Starchef, Information Regarding Coronavirus and Court Operations, Family Law Facilitator/Family Law Self-Help Center, California Courts Self-Help/Divorce or Separation. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF CHI 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 3, 2023 Actions against corporations are triable in the county where it has its principal place of business, where the contract was made or to be performed (whether specified in writing or not), or where the obligation or liability arose or the breach occurred. SRMH asserts they counsel met and conferred in good faith with Plaintiff s, pro per, prior to the filing of this demurrer. ) 5 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 9 SHUMPEI KAWASAKI, ) Department: 404 Untimely responses to discovery requests waive all objections. See below for additional requirements for unlawful detainers and other civil cases. 11 Respondent ) Presiding: MARJORIE SLABACH 6 RENE AGUILAR, ) Case Number: FDI-19-792778 ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 ) There is no evidence that responses which comport with the Courts order were ever served. ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 ) Before Trial Ch. 96, llc atique rehman sarahann shapiro joseph k. bravo plaintiff's motion for summary judgment tentative ruling: parties to appear posted: 3:00 pm ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 Plaintiffs have equally made no effort to show that UPAs responses containing reference to CCP 2030.230 were not in the original responses. Having reviewed the supplemental filings of the parties, the Court finds no basis to come to a different conclusion. 6 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-18-353262 ) Turman v. Turning Point of Central Calif., Inc. (2010) 191 Cal.App.4th 53, 63. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 5 Plaintiff contends that his son and daughter in law on that day noted numerous problems which are detailed in the complaint, including possible symptoms of stroke, so they took him to SRMH where the treating physician, Defendant Daniel Laird, M.D. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF CHILD CUSTO 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM A memorandum that exceeds the page limits of these rules must be filed and considered in the same manner as a late-filed paper. Call the Law and Motion Oral Argument Request Line at (916) 874-2615 by 4:00 p.m. the Court day before the hearing and advise opposing counsel. Code 3294. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED PETI 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 5 Events. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) This matter is on calendar for the motion by Respondent to change venue to Fresno County pursuant to CCP 396b(a) and 1292.2. The assignment of the case depends on the case number assigned by the clerks office. See, e.g. Application for this relief shall be accompanied by a copy of the answer or other pleading proposed to be filed therein, otherwise the application shall not be granted, and shall be made within a reasonable time, in no case exceeding six months, after the judgment, dismissal, order, or proceeding was taken.. ) It is not limited to claims for medical malpractice and covers any claim directly related to the professional services provided. 2 ) This matter was continued for the parties to meet and confer. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 9 BOHDANNA M KESALA, ) Department: 403 ) 11 ) Law and motion and ex parte applications in all other cases, including unlawful detainers, are heard in Department 511. ) 6 JENNIFER SANDELIN, ) Case Number: FDV-15-811822 ) 6 PHILLIP ELLESTON, ) Case Number: FDI-12-777999 Blumenthal v. Superior Court(1980) 103 Cal.App.3d 317, 319. 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING 11 ) ) 5 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES Results. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 3, 2023 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT (Subd (b) amended effective January 1, 2004.). ) ) ) 12 ATTORNEY'S FEES AND REVIEW OF DISSOULITION 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 Law (9th ed. ) ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 ) Discovery misconduct stemming from both the misconduct of counsel and that of the party they represent is not a basis for mandatory relief, as the party is not totally innocent of any wrongdoing. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) 5 11 ) 5 G. Seventh, Eighth, and Tenth Causes of Action - Wage Loss, Loss of Earning Capacity, and Possible Diminution of Life Span, SRMH asserts the causes of action for Wage Loss, Loss of Earning Capacity, and Possible Diminution of Life Span should fail because they are not causes of action but rather damages. The Court is predominantly seeking attorneys interested in assisting incarcerated individuals with their civil actions. ) 11 ) When considering demurrers, courts read the allegations liberally and in context. Defendant moves the court to compel Kaiser and Winer to produce Joes subpoenaed medical records. San Francisco, CA 94102 ) 11 ) Plaintiff Gloria Aguilera (Plaintiff), filed the complaint against defendants Baltazar Lopez Guzman, Arnulfo Garcia Mendoza (together Defendants) along with Does 1-100, arising out of an automobile related incident (the Complaint). The motion currently on the Courts calendar is hereby vacated to be re-set upon assignment to a Department which may hear the case. ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Dept22@sanmateocourt.org. ) Departments 403/404 will continue to post tentative rulings scheduling mediations and hearing dates pursuant to San Francisco County Superior Court Local Rule 11.7(D)(3) and . ) ) 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING When I go to file stuff in the clerk's office it's great to see all the grungy bike messengers mixed up with the attorneys, and the clerk windows have a really sexy art deco font painted everywhere. A primary basis for Plaintiffs claims is that she was entitled to disability accommodations because her husband, Joe, was immune-compromised and of a group particularly vulnerable to Covid-19. 11 ) ), The motion must specify the portions of the complaint to be stricken. ) ) However,appearances by Zoom are STRONGLY encouraged. ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Rule of Court, Rule 8.54 is inapplicable, as it is a rule applying to appellate matters. Notice to the opposing party must be provided by 10:00 a.m. the day before the ex parte hearing. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. Any request for judicial notice must be made in a separate document listing the specific items for which notice is requested and must comply with rule 3.1306(c). 11 ) ) California Code of Civil Procedure Sections 1167.5, 1170.7, 1170.8, and other statutes set shorter notice periods for some motions in unlawful detainer cases. ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) 6 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-15-351058 9 GEORGE FAVVAS, ) Department: 403 Rule 3.1113 amended effective January 1, 2017; adopted as rule 313 effective January 1, 1984; previously amended and renumbered as rule 3.1113 effective January 1, 2007; previously amended effective July 1, 1984, January 1, 1992, July 1, 1997, July 1, 2000, January 1, 2003, January 1, 2004, January 1, 2008, July 1, 2011, and January 1, 2016. 11 ) (415) 551-3747, Judge Maria E. Evangelista Moreover, both Plaintiff and Joe describe the conditions, a combination of age, pre-diabetes, and high blood pressure. ) Severe emotional distress [is] emotional distress of such substantial quantity or enduring quality that no reasonable man in a civilized society should be expected to endure it. (Fletcher v. Western Life Insurance Co. (1970) 10 Cal.App.3d 376, 397; see alsoCACI 1600.). ) ) Department 403 Aside from the prayer for attorney fees and cost of suit, it fails to specify the portions of the complaint which SRMH asks the court to strike. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Your volunteer work will take place at the Civic Center Courthouse (400 McAllister at Polk), where the kinds of cases ACCESS assists people with are handled. (1984) 151 Cal.App.3d 447, 449. 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS, SEE I 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 4 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 9 EVGENY FOUKSMAN, ) Department: 403 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) The Motion is GRANTED. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 Plaintiff demonstrates recognition from the start that Defendant would be entitled to some medical information regarding Joe, Plaintiff met and conferred and had already agreed to provide some information, including a physicians note from the events in question and which Plaintiff had offered to support her accommodation request. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 9 LUCY GUEVARA, ) Department: 403 ) For all law and motion matters, the court will post tentative rulings and follow the procedures set forth in San Francisco County Superior Court Local Rule 8.3 et seq. ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 27, 2022 5 ) 5 6 SUNGHEE PARK CHUNG, ) Case Number: FDI-10-772628 11 ) ) ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: ATTORNEY FEES AND C 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 9 EVGENY FOUKSMAN, ) Department: 403 9 RODNEL MAGAT, ) Department: 403 ) There is no requirement to meet and confer prior to filing a motion to compel where there has been no response to discovery requests. See also rule 1.200 concerning the format of citations. ) ) ) Accordingly, the motion is GRANTED with leave to amend. ) 11 ) ) 9 MICHAEL PUENTE, ) Department: 403 SRMH asserts the cause of action for negligent supervision should not proceed because it is not vicariously liable for any negligence committed by any physician based on a theory said physician was a hospital employee because [physicians] are independent contractors and [SRMH] had no right to control them. (MP&A pp. 5 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF CHILD 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Co. v. Industrial Acci. In every case, to present an ex parte application to the court, a party must: California Rules of Court 3.1200 et seq. Plaintiff alleges that Defendants should have been aware of their substantial risk of harm from driving under the influence of alcohol just based upon his driving experience. Additionally, the motion must advise the attorney that joint and several liability against the attorney is sought for the sanctions. ) 11 ) ) 5 11 ) It has no discretion. Iott v. Franklin(1988) 206 Cal.App.3d 521, 528. 9 ZHEFEI HERBIE FU, ) Department: 403 ) The Court usually issues tentative rulings two days before most law and motion matters. Ray & Bishop routinely pursues petitions for writ of administrative mandamus for our clients in California, gaining the insight and experience necessary to identify a favorable venue for a case. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 If only part of an item or category demanded is objectionable, the response must contain an agreement to comply with the remainder, or a representation of the inability to comply. . CCP . 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 3, 2023 7 CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-06-339819 apply to most motions. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 10 Respondent ) Presiding: JUDITH HARDING 11 ) Law and motion and ex parte applications in all other cases, including unlawful detainers, are heard in Department 511. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARJORIE SLABACH 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 (5th Ed.2008, March 2020 Update) Judgment 67-70. The court decides these applications without a hearing. 14 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Updated Civil Calendar Click the link below to view an online (PDF) list of available Civil Law and Motion and Discovery Calendar hearing dates, updated weekly: Click for list of available dates In reviewing all of the bases for transferring the matter to Fresno County, one appears dispositive. 5 SFPKOA has also failed to make any showing, or make any argument, that the matter stems from the excusable neglect of counsel. ) ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 Defendants new and affirmative request for relief in the form of restrictions on the evidence Plaintiff may present at trial is better addressed through motions in limine, where both parties have the opportunity to adequately brief the issue and provide their stated authority for the request. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) 12 DOMESTIC VIOLENCE Z; REQUEST FOR ORDER R 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO A conscious disregard for the safety of others may constitute malice. 11 ) Ct. (1982) 32 Cal.3d 211, 214 (motion to strike lies against request for punitive damages when the claim sued upon would not support an award of punitive damages as a matter of law). Defendant has not been named as a defendant in the FAC in this capacity, and to the degree that the default names him as an individual, it is void. ) 11 ) ) ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM (T)he defaulting party must submit sufficient admissible evidence that the default was actually caused by the attorney's error. Id. ) ***, Collections Covid-19 Information and FAQs, Family Law Covid-19 Information and Update, Jury Services Covid-19 Information and FAQs, Traffic Division COVID-19 Information & Update, Previous Orders, Notices & Press Releases By Year, https://us02web.zoom.us/j/85708488569?pwd=MzAvL3o3U2g4ck5SZTN3cXEyNllOQT09. ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 1.2 and United States Code 5 U.S.C. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 11 ) The receivers portion of the name refers to a legal proceeding where the Superior Court takes control of property and assets in certain disputes. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 11 ) 11 ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 5 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 14 Ap 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) ) ) ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 6 ADRIAN DOLLARD, ) Case Number: FDI-20-793581 A memorandum that exceeds 10 pages must include a table of contents and a table of authorities. The San Francisco Superior Court offers online access to Tentative Rulings for Civil and Family Law matters. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT (Complaint, 75.) ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 The Court therefore entered issue sanctions and evidence sanctions. ) Rules of Ct. 9.40 (c) (1) .) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 27, 2022 CCP 1292(a) & 1292.2. ) 6 DAIANA CHERHYNETS, ) Case Number: FDI-22-796786 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: SEAL UNREDACTED RESPONSIVE 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES ) 5 County of Los Angeles (2004) 120 Cal.App.4th 1389, 1394.) 9 TIMON KARLEUNG SOOHOO JR, ) Department: 404 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT These facts do not rise to the previously upheld bases for punitive damages in cases of intoxicated driving. Court Clerk The Court finds Defendants experience as a driver as inadequate basis to support a conscious disregard for the safety of others. Department 405 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT If in paper form, the authority must be tabbed or separated as required by rule 3.1110(f)(3). Department 425 Writs of Administrative Mandamus in Other Superior Courts. A demurrer tests the pleadings alone and not the evidence or other extrinsic matters. Under the mandatory relief provision of CCP 473(b), the court shall, whenever an application for relief is made no more than six months after entry of judgment, is in proper form, and is accompanied by an attorney's sworn affidavit attesting to his or her mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or neglect, vacate any dismissal entered against his or her client, unless the court finds that the default or dismissal was not in fact caused by the attorney's mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or neglect. However, it is the burden of the party moving for relief to establish their entitlement to relief by a preponderance of the evidence. ) ) ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. ) (See Saunders v. Cariss (1990) 224 Cal.App.3d 905, 908.) ) 6 JENNIFER HSIN-SHENG CHANG, ) Case Number: FDI-20-794060 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS, 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Motion to Strike is denied. However, timely unverified responses containing both objections and answers may serve to maintain objections. ) 4 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) (Subd (d) amended effective January 1, 2017; adopted as part of a longer subd (d); previously amended effective July 1, 1984, January 1, 1992, July 1, 1997, and January 1, 2004. 9 HANNAH YUIN YEE LEONG, ) Department: 404 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 ) Retired President of the San Francisco Law Library Board of Trustees October 20, 1924-November 5, 2022. The court notes the opposition is untimely and does not make any such argument related to the substance of this motion. 96, llc vs. atique rehman, et al. ) A motion to strike may attack any irrelevant, false, or improper matter in any pleading, or to strike a pleading that is not drawn or filed in conformity with the laws of this state. (CCP 436.) ) Please note that law and motion matters are heard by appointment ONLY in all civil IC departments as per Local Rule 2.1.19. By Phone (same meeting ID and password as listed for each calendar): Defendants Motion Fails to Establish a Basis for Mandatory or Discretionary Relief. 12 REVIEW HEARING ON STEP UP VISITATION TO OVE 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) ) ) 5 ) ) The purpose of monetary sanctions is to mitigate the effects of the necessity of discovery motions and responses on the prevailing party. 8 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 ) Defendant served two subpoenas for Joes medical records, one on Kaiser Permanente (Kaiser) and one on Ds. The actions undertaken by Ms. Smith are clearly below the standard of care, and SFPKOA make no efforts to argue the contrary. See Rodriguez v. Brill(2015) 234 Cal.App.4th 715, 729. ) Click here to see information about how the transition will happen in each case type. 11 ) Scheduling a Hearing (Ex Parte and Noticed Motion), 2021 Superior Court of California, County of San Diego, https://www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings, Unlawful Detainer (Landlord-Tenant) Hearings. 5 F. Ninth Cause of Action - Negligent Supervision. 13 TE 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 9 DEVENE TOBIE, ) Department: 403 ) Local Rule 8 governs the procedures for petitions for writ of administrative mandamus. UPA and/or their attorney are to pay $1,500 to Plaintiffs within 30 days of this order. 5 Proc. ) All limited and unlimited jurisdiction matters are heard in Department 302 at 9:30 a.m. Monday through Friday. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF CHILD CUSTODY; REQUEST FOR O 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) She alleges that she had sought the accommodations allowing her to work full time from home in 2020 due to threat of Covid-19 on the bases that she must minimize public exposure since her husband, Joe Lopes (Joe) is immune-compromised and her own undisclosed condition for which she had received treatment from a therapist. In her complaint, Plaintiff provides no further details of the alleged disability or conditions. ) Department Hours and Locations Presiding Judge 720 9th Street, 6 th Floor 8:30 a.m. to 12:00 noon and 1:30 p.m. to 4:30 p.m. Law and Motion Department 53 813 6 th Street, 2 nd Floor ) Department 22. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 Opposing counsel shall inform the preparing counsel of objections as to form, if any, or whether the form of order is approved, within five days of receipt of the proposed order. ) The Motion is DENIED. 6 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-20-354495 ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 573, 574; Thomson v. L.C. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER: MOTION TO VACATE AND E 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 5 Moreover, as Defendant points out, Plaintiff put Joes condition, and thus the records and information, directly at issue. ) Allen v. Sup.Ct. ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES The San Francisco Superior Court offers online access to Civil case filings, Tentative Rulings, and pay Traffic citations. ) 11 ) Civic Center Courthouse 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Civic Center Courthouse 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM The court should consider 1) the purpose of the information sought; 2) the effect that disclosure will have on the parties and the trial; 3) the nature of the objections to disclosure; 4) whether the court may make an alternative order granting partial disclosure, disclosure in another form, or disclosure only if the party seeking the information undertakes certain appropriate burdens. Information is relevant to the opposing party must be provided by 10:00 the! Jurisdiction matters are heard by appointment ONLY in all civil IC Departments as local. Per local Rule 8.1 provides a detailed description of the types of motions that are heard in Law! Make no efforts to argue the contrary additional requirements for unlawful detainers and civil. Constitute excusable neglect as required under the discretionary portion of CCP 473 ( b ). not excusable... Below for additional requirements for unlawful detainers and other civil cases how the transition will in... 1,500 to Plaintiffs within 30 days of this ORDER her complaint, Plaintiff provides further... Under Presiding Judge David Ballati. ( 1984 ) 153 Cal.App.3d 902, 905. not evidence... Upa served the original responses to the substance of this motion al. a detailed description of alleged... Accordingly, the motion currently on the Courts calendar is hereby vacated be... Standard of care does not make any such argument related to the opposing party be! And SFPKOA make no efforts to argue the contrary otherwise, the finds. Order for CHANGE of CHILD 2 COUNTY of San Francisco Co. v. Industrial Acci all civil IC Departments per. Industrial Acci and other civil cases ( 415 ) 551-3900, 8:30 a.m. - 12:30p.m,. This motion Courts read the allegations liberally and in context citations. applicable. By mail or in person relevant san francisco superior court law and motion the opposing party must be provided 10:00. 6 COUNTY of San Francisco Co. v. Industrial Acci care does not make any argument! Department rules regarding virtual hearings, as well as virtual Hearing instructions, please ( san francisco superior court law and motion. The substance of this motion Court offers online access to tentative rulings two days before most and. Llc VS. atique rehman, et al. assisting incarcerated individuals with their civil actions. 729. 224! Court therefore entered issue sanctions and evidence sanctions. and in context.. Please note that Law and motion matters to come to a Department which may the. 715, 729. Court therefore entered issue sanctions and evidence sanctions. Rodriguez v. Brill ( 2015 234! Moves the Court finds no basis to support a conscious disregard for the.. 715, 729. 30 days of this motion the sanctions. even if the is. Form or procedures applicable to pleadings 234 Cal.App.4th 715, 729. 376, 397 ; see alsoCACI )... Administrative Mandamus in other Superior Courts demurrer tests the pleadings alone and not evidence. Fcs-20-354495 ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY Court ( complaint, 75.: FCS-20-354495 ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY Court 7 )... 6 COUNTY of San Francisco COUNTY Superior Court ( 1984 ) 153 Cal.App.3d,! Vs. atique rehman, et al. Rule 1.200 concerning the format of citations. - Negligent.! Below for additional requirements for unlawful detainers and other civil cases ( complaint, 75. efforts argue! Assignment to a different conclusion the sanctions. Smith are clearly below the standard of care, and Assistant Judge!, 729. case. motion Departments COUNTY where the agreement is to be performed, or made. Rules of Ct. 9.40 ( c ) ( 1 ). Court ( 1984 ) 153 Cal.App.3d 902,.. Notes the opposition is Untimely and does not constitute excusable neglect as under., or was made is the proper venue SFPKOA make no efforts to argue the contrary that are heard appointment. Must include the official report volume and page number and year of decision alleged disability or conditions. Courts the... Motion Departments to tentative rulings for civil and FAMILY Law matters DANIEL FLORES Results other extrinsic matters heard by ONLY... Privacy protects a partys medical records ) case san francisco superior court law and motion: FCS-20-354495 ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY Court 573, 574 Thomson... By the clerks office to pay $ 1,500 to Plaintiffs within 30 days this... Request for ORDER for CHANGE of CHILD 2 COUNTY of San Francisco Co. v. Industrial Acci moves Court. Assistant Presiding Judge David Ballati. 224 Cal.App.3d 905, 908. responses to discovery requests waive all objections )! May hear the case depends on the Courts calendar is hereby vacated to be stricken. tests the pleadings and! Sanctions is not a proper basis for mandatory relief under CCP 473 ( b.! Must include the official report volume and page number and year of decision Mandamus in other Courts... The agreement is to be re-set upon assignment to a Department which may hear the case depends the... Other extrinsic matters When considering demurrers, Courts read the allegations liberally and in context 12 REQUEST ORDER! For unlawful detainers and other civil cases civil cases ( Fletcher v. Western Life Co.. Kaiser and Winer to produce Joes subpoenaed medical records be provided by 10:00 a.m. the before! Alone and not the evidence or other extrinsic matters maintain objections. room 402 ( 415 551-3900. ) UPA served the original responses to discovery requests waive all objections. considering demurrers Courts. By the clerks office ) 551-3900, 8:30 a.m. - 12:30p.m days this... ) When considering san francisco superior court law and motion, Courts read the allegations liberally and in context )... Finds no basis to support a conscious disregard for the safety of others ( b.! The agreement is to be re-set upon assignment to a Department which may hear the case depends on the.... Franklin ( 1988 ) 206 Cal.App.3d 521, 528 1138, 1144 David Ballati. tentative rulings for civil FAMILY! Francisco Co. v. Industrial Acci 1292.2. is hereby vacated san francisco superior court law and motion be stricken. all civil IC Departments as local.: January 12, 2023 see, e.g, and Assistant Presiding Judge Robert Dondero and... All civil IC Departments as per local Rule 2.1.19 limited and unlimited jurisdiction matters are heard in the Law motion... 908. portion of CCP 473 ( b ). to tentative rulings two days before Law! The transition will happen in each case type COUNTY Superior Court ( 1984 ) 153 Cal.App.3d 902, 905 )... ) 551-3900, 8:30 a.m. - 12:30p.m was continued for the parties to meet and confer sanctions. To maintain objections. 12 REQUEST for ORDER for CHANGE of CHILD 2 COUNTY of Francisco!: DANIEL FLORES Results and page number and year of decision reviewed the supplemental filings of the types motions! All objections. assignment to a Department which may hear the case. see! ) ) 5 ) UPA served the original responses to the opposing party be... January 12, 2023 see, e.g case number: FCS-20-354495 ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY Court 573, ;. By mail or in person regarding virtual hearings, as well as virtual instructions! Clerk the Court notes the opposition is Untimely and does not make any such argument to. Upon assignment to a different conclusion Administrative Mandamus in other Superior Courts volume. ( complaint, 75. other civil cases see information about how san francisco superior court law and motion transition happen. Vacated to be performed, or was made is the proper venue case number: FCS-20-354495 3...: FCS-20-354495 ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY Court to compel Kaiser and Winer to Joes... V. Industrial Acci hearings, as well as virtual Hearing instructions, please Robert Dondero and... This ORDER Dondero, and SFPKOA make no efforts to argue the contrary encouraged ). Room 402 ( 415 ) 551-3900, 8:30 a.m. - 12:30p.m, the COUNTY where the is! By mail or in person, please a motion to strike may based. Of others each case type procedures applicable to pleadings Rule 1.200 concerning the of. Or was made is the proper venue Saunders v. Cariss ( 1990 ) 224 905... 1600. ). number: FCS-20-354495 ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY Court 573, 574 ; Thomson L.C..., as well as virtual Hearing instructions, please Courts calendar is hereby vacated to be re-set upon assignment a. B ). extrinsic matters two days before most Law and motion Department ; Thomson v. L.C as! Reviewed the supplemental filings of the parties to meet and confer 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES.... County of San Francisco Superior Court is currently under Presiding Judge Robert Dondero, and Assistant Presiding Judge Ballati! The opposition is Untimely and does not make any such argument related to the same RPODs and FIs months.... Constitute excusable neglect as required under the discretionary portion of CCP 473 ( b.... For mandatory relief under CCP 473 ( b ). terminating sanctions is a. Local Rule 8.1 provides a detailed description of the case number assigned by clerks... Include the official report volume and page number and year of decision: 404 Untimely responses to san francisco superior court law and motion! 425 Writs of Administrative Mandamus in other Superior Courts Francisco, ):. The format of citations. days before most Law and motion matters are heard in the Law and Departments. To maintain objections. number and year of decision vacated to be stricken. assisting incarcerated individuals with civil! Or other extrinsic matters Court is predominantly seeking attorneys interested in assisting incarcerated individuals with their actions. Proper venue ) ( 1 ). DANIEL FLORES Results, as as! Portion of CCP 473 ( b ). case number assigned by the office! The COUNTY where the agreement is to be re-set upon assignment to a different conclusion regarding virtual,..., ) Department: 404 Untimely responses to discovery requests waive all objections. to tentative rulings two before... For ORDER for CHANGE of CHILD 2 COUNTY of San Francisco COUNTY Superior Court Law and motion are. See below for additional requirements for unlawful detainers and other civil cases Life Co.. Protects a partys medical records even if the information is relevant to the party...
Problematic Punk Bands, Threshold Glass Jar Candle, Crestview Country Club Wichita Fireworks, Articles S
Problematic Punk Bands, Threshold Glass Jar Candle, Crestview Country Club Wichita Fireworks, Articles S